11/14/2005
Do the Mets really want a dramatic, older outfielder such as Manny Ramirez, especially if they have to give up a boatload to get him? -- Keith H., Rutland, Vt.
Why would the Mets trade Lastings Milledge and Yusmeiro Petit? Have they not learned from trading Preston Wilson, Terrance Long, A.J. Burnett and Scott Kazmir? Ramirez is not the answer in left. He is 33 years old, and we would be committing a lot of money to him. Plus he's a problem on a team, much like Terrell Owens. What's your take? -- Greg L., Delray Beach, Fla.
One of the great things about being a Mets fans the last five years has been waiting for David Wright and Jose Reyes and seeing them develop. I'd like to do the same with Milledge. I have no interest in seeing Manny Ramirez try to play the outfield at Shea Stadium. -- Sandy K., Boston
If this were 1996, I'd take Ramirez in a minute and put up with his [behavior] and his defense. But what are the Mets asking for here? A problem who's undoubtedly closer to the end of this career than the middle of it. So now they get him, pay him millions and then they'll say they have to cut payroll in two years. -- Thomas K., Suffern, N.Y.
Manny and Terrell Owens may indeed have the same disruption gene, though it seems Owens may be a more actively disruptive force. Matters such as these always come down to whether the projected benefits -- run production in Ramirez's case -- will be offset or exceeded by the predicted problems. No question, Ramirez created ripples in Boston and, to a lesser degree, in Cleveland. And the New York media, by its sheer number, is an issue in the most benign circumstances. Unrest does seem to follow Ramirez. And Shea Stadium doesn't have a scoreboard to serve as his hiding place.
His playing in his hometown is another issue. Most players -- and clubs -- believe it's a problem. And Ramirez's defense is another potential problem, particularly if he returns to right field, which he hasn't played regularly since his days with Indians.
But Ramirez hits, and Shea Stadium, as pitcher friendly as it is, won't hold him. Then again, he usually has been surrounded by other hitters. Depending on whom the Mets would deal to obtain him, their batting order will match neither the Red Sox's of the last five years nor the Indians' from 1995 to 2000.
Because Ramirez would come in a trade and not as a free agent, the Mets would have to pay in players as well as money. Their finances are their business. We know neither their revenue nor the expenses. But dealing promising, young (and, for now, inexpensive) talent for an expensive, 33-year-old, probably productive, defensively-challenged player with a history of unsettling his clubhouse seems to be tempting fate.
The Mets have to consider Ramirez's influence on younger Latin players, too. If they are interested in signing Julio Franco, that may suggest they don't see quiet and reserved Carlos Beltran or Pedro Martinez, who is neither, as sufficiently positive influences.
There is a school of thinking that says homegrown talent has greater fan appeal -- see the '80s and Dwight Gooden, Darryl Strawberry, Lenny Dykstra and Wally Backman -- all else being equal. And there already is a buzz about Milledge and Petit.
That said, the Mets obtained Mike Piazza and Al Leiter in the deals that, respectively, cost them Wilson and Burnett. And Piazza and Leiter arguably were the most critical components in the Mets' 1998-2000 run of success. We don't know about Kazmir yet, and Long didn't develop as the club had projected.
There are no universally-held tenets in creating a successful team, but the Orioles and Dodgers of the '60s, the Dodgers, Reds and Royals of the '70s, the Mets and Twins of the late '80s, the Yankees and Astros of the mid-'90s and the Braves of the last 14 years seemingly have found success by developing and retaining young talent.
General manager Omar Minaya has identified David Wright, Jose Reyes and -- even though he is imported -- Beltran as the Mets' "core" players and said Milledge is likely to become one. Ramirez, who turns 34 in May, won't become part of the core.
I've been seeing reports that the Mets are looking at a possible deal with the Devil Rays for Danys Baez and Aubrey Huff. If this is true, why not pursue that and look to add Alfonso Soriano to the lineup? That would prevent a young team in search of an identity from having to take on the baggage of a Ramirez type. I don't see anything wrong with that potential lineup. Young, hard-working talent across the board. All the Mets would have to lose would be Aaron Heilman, Petit or Jae Seo. Seems like a good deal to me. What's the chance of this happening? -- Jesse J., Rochester, N.Y.
The Mets are shooting higher than Huff to be the run producer they add and Baez to be the closer they obtain. And by pursuing Rafael Furcal, they are saying Soriano isn't the only solution for their problem at second base. I think you may be underestimating what the Mets could acquire by dealing any combination of those pitchers; not that they wouldn't have to give more -- a position player, perhaps -- in either of the two deals you advocate.
Evidently, Huff doesn't fit in the Devil Rays' plans, so a package of say, Heilman and another player -- not Seo or Petit -- might work.
It seems every team that asks for Heilman wants him to be a starter, yet the Mets are committed to keeping him in the bullpen. Why does it seem that these teams know something Mets management doesn't? I understand Heilman's importance in the shaky bullpen, but wouldn't he be more valuable as in the starting rotation? Then the Mets could look to trade a different starting pitcher for another reliever? -- Matt D., Newark, Del.
Perhaps it's the other way, that the Mets know more about their players -- Heilman, in this case -- than the other clubs do. Just because another club wants Heilman to start doesn't mean he is better suited for that role. It may be merely that the other club needs a starter and likes its bullpen as is. The Mets believe Heilman needs to throw higher quality strikes with his fastball -- i.e., spot his fastball -- to be an effective starter or closer.
Why not create a John Olerud/Mike Jacobs platoon at first base, trade Kaz Matsui and a prospect for Ivan Rodriguez, sign Billy Wagner, keep Heilman, get Ramirez for Mike Cameron and Kris Benson, keep Cliff Floyd, re-sign Braden Looper and lastly, trade Petit and Seo for Jason Schmidt?
So this would be next year's starting lineup: Jose Reyes, shortstop; Furcal, second base; Floyd, left; Ramirez, right; Carlos Beltran, center field; Rodriguez, catcher; David Wright, third; Jacobs/Olerud, first. Starting pitchers: Martinez, Jason Schmidt, Tom Glavine, Steve Trachsel and Victor Zambrano. Relievers: Wagner, Heilman, Looper. -- Thomas J. B., Clifton Park, N.Y.
Wow! Hope all that wasn't in one breath. First of all, Olerud and Jacobs both bat left-handed, so your first base plan doesn't have the usual benefits of a platoon. To trade Matsui and a prospect for a Major League regular -- even if it were a 34-year-old catcher as Rodriquez is -- the prospect would have to be Willie Mays.
And if Benson, Seo and Petit were traded and Schmidt were the only starter imported, who would be the protection for the rotation in 2006 and beyond? The average age of your 2006 rotation would be 34. Moreover, no club is going to deal its No. 1 starter for two pitchers whose combined big league record is 22-24.
We all know the bullpen woes on the Mets as well as the other MLB teams, especially when it comes to lefties. However, what's the deal with Felix Heredia? If the Mets are just trying to keep him off the field, injured or not, why don't they just release him and eat his contract and move on? -- Chris D., Pt. Jefferson, N.Y.
The Mets declined to exercise the option on Heredia's contract. They will pay his $200,000 buyout rather than a 2006 salary of $2.5 million. Heredia filed for free agency Thursday.
In light of Omar Minaya's reported pursuit of A.J. Burnett (and my wish for a pursuit of Kazmir in a few years), in your experience, how much does a player who was traded away want to play for the team that originally drafted him? -- Kirk L., Irvington, N.Y.
Interesting question. I suspect how long a player plays for the organization that drafted him before he is traded influences his feelings about the organization. Kazmir wasn't pleased about being traded to the Devil Rays in 2004. He probably doesn't know how he'd feel if he were traded back to the Mets.
Lee Mazzili was delighted to return to the Mets in 1986 -- they were in first place. He had been traded in 1982 after coming up through the Mets organization. Hubie Brooks, dealt in the Gary Carter trade in 1985, returned to the Mets in 1991 and enjoyed his second tour. The same can't be said for Jeromy Burnitz, who like Brooks, signed with the Mets as an amateur. Traded to the Indians in 1995, Burnitz returned in 2002 and didn't enjoy his return because he struggled throughout the season.
Jacobs had 11 home runs in 100 at-bats and batted .310. He deserves a chance at first base. Multiply his production by four for 400 at-bats, and you get 44 home runs. Not bad. He has a very smooth swing with power. Can he play the outfield? -- Edward R., Bridgewater, N.J.
The game's history is littered with players who produced at remarkable levels in their first weeks as big leaguers and then struggled. Jacobs had a nice start. But I'm comfortable predicting he won't hit 44 home runs in his first 400 at-bats in 2006. He may get his chance at first base, but not in the outfield.
I love how the Mets have been sticking with their youth movement. Can they Mets stick with Jacobs at first and pick up Tino Martinez? Tino would bring veteran leadership and a steady glove at a cheap prize and be insurance in case the Jacobs experiment doesn't work out. -- Trevor V., Hoboken, N.J.
The club is more inclined to bring in a veteran right-handed-hitting first baseman -- possibly Franco -- to share time with Jacobs.
Do you think that Furcal be willing to play second base, considering the Cubs and Braves would allow him to play shortstop? -- Stefan C., Old Tappan, N.J.
Chances are the deciding factor will be money. Furcal has played second base in the big leagues and winter ball. It doesn't appear to be an issue. If offers from the Mets, Cubs and Braves were equal, he probably would opt to play shortstop.
Source: http://newyork.mets.mlb.com/